American Nazi, Ashkenazi, Zionist 4th Riech

“The dust of controversy is merely the falsehood flying off.”

— Thomas Carlyle (1795-1881) British historian and essayist.

Jim Marrs ~ The Nazis, The Vatican & The Fourth Reich

Ignore the polemic Jones he’s a Zionist shill and admits to as much 30 min in. -There is much useful data here Jim Marrs with Alex Jones, July 24, 2008.

America’s Nazi Allies in Israel and Ukraine


The U.S. is now the chief sponsor of two nazi, ethnically cleansing, nations. In one of them (Ukraine), the U.S. President, Barack Obama, himself placed nazis into control there; the nazi control was imposed by him, via his agents. In the other (Israel), nazis have controlled for decades, and Obama merely extends their control by continuing American support.

The difference between nazism and mere fascism is that, as exemplified by Mussolini, fascism is pure “corporationism” (see page 426 there), not necessarily racist; whereas nazism, as exemplified by Hitler, is a profoundly and ineradicably racist, usually religious-based, form of fascism. It’s “corporationism” plus ethnic bigotry. Hitler’s version of nazism happened to be focused against Jews, but that’s not necessary to nazism; any racist fascism is nazi. (NOTE: a lower-case “nazi” is any nazi, but an upper-case one, a “Nazi,” refers to a member of Hitler’s Party, which was Germany’s nazi party, the first-ever nazi party, the original “Nazi Party.” Similarly, Mussolini’s party was the Italian “Fascist” party, the first fascist party, but other nations have their own fascist and/or nazi parties.)


A Dangerous  Megalomania

Published on Aug 2, 2012

Michael Hoffman questions the legitimacy of anyone’s claim of being a Jew.
Michael’s web site is:

OpEdNews Op Eds 7/24/2014 at 13:06:31




-People of any ethnic group can be nazis, and Jews are no different from other ethnicities in that regard. For example, on July 21st, Jonathan Cook headlined from Nazareth, “Calls for genocide enter Israeli mainstream,” and he documented his headline-claim by quoting Jewish nazis around Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

First, Cook quoted Ayelet Shaked. From 2006 to 2008, she had been the Office Manager for Prime Minister Netanyahu. In January 2012, Netanyahu’s Likud Party appointed her to be their “Coordinator.” A half-year later, in June, she co-founded her own right-wing Party, “My Israel.” In 2013, Israelis elected her to the Knesset, their parliament, as a Jewish Home Party leader.

On 1 July 2014, she posted to facebook an article by Uri Elitzur, who “was also close to Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu, helping him in his 1996 campaign, and took a leave of absence from his journalistic activities to work in the Prime Minister’s Office, which he headed in 1998-99.” So: Elitzur had been Shaked’s mentor. She introduced his article by saying that it was “Relevant today as it was then.” Here are excerpts from it, in the Bing translation at her facebook page:


“The Palestinian people has declared war on us, and we need to fight back. … Who is the enemy? The Palestinian people. Why? You ask him, he started [the war]. … All the Palestinian people is the enemy. All war is between two peoples. … All the enemy fighters and bleeding in the head. It’s also the mothers of the martyrs, that send them to hell with flowers and kisses. They need to follow them [to die], there’s nothing in it. They need to go [die], and the physical House [in] which they raised the snake [must be destroyed]. Other small snakes grow more [if that house stands]. … Each bomber should have known he was taking with him both his parents and his home and neighbors. All UM Jihad hero that sends her son to hell needs to know that she’s going with him. Along with the House and all that.”

In short: she was (and he was) saying to exterminate the Palestinian “people,” and to destroy “the House and all that.” Extermination-intent is clear. Shaked and Elitzur clearly are Jewish nazis, and not merely Jewish fascists. What Hitler was to Jews, Elitzur and Shaked are to Palestinians. Their “war” is against an entire “people,” and victory means exterminating it, killing “the snake,” so that there will be no “small snakes.”

Mr. Cook then quotes a scholar in Israel, who was not censured by his university for saying: “A terrorist, like those who kidnapped the boys [in the West Bank on June 12] and killed them, the only thing that will deter them, is if they know that either their sister or mother will be raped if they are caught. What can we do? This is the culture that we live in [surrounded by Muslims].” That person, Mordechai Kedar, a lecturer on Arabic literature at Bar Ilan University, is also a nazi. Hitler, too, blamed his racism on the ethnicity that he hated, and he cited the Bible as justifying it (both the Old and New Testaments, both of which are racist; and he knew the Bible well, and cited more than a hundred of its passages, as I documented in my WHY the Holocaust Happened). Read More:

ashkenazi ask a nazi

Nazi Jews? Yes, Nazi Jews

This may be one of the more controversial articles I’ve written [to date], and I suspect it will make a few readers uncomfortable. But, we all need to look at topics that make us uncomfortable. Comfort and safety are polar opposites. To secure our future, we must listen to those unsavory rebels who are trying to tell us the truth:

“Controversy is only dreaded by the advocates of error.”

— Benjamin Rush (1746-1813) American physician, writer, educator

A subject that has been taboo to many researchers over the years is the Holocaust. There are three reasons for the natural aversion society feels to questioning the topic. One of them, is the “thought crime” laws passed in various parts of this world, notably Canada and about ten European [Union] countries, threatening those who choose to question what may have happened with jail time. This has been compounded with the all too convenient and all too loaded charge of “Holocaust denier,” which has ruined many an academic career.

holocampanne frank fraud

The second reason, is the mental conditioning the American public, and a good part of the Western world, has gone through. The joke of a simplified politically correct, as written by the winners, system of historical education aside, we’ve also been programmed via scores of Hollywood movies depicting the Holocaust; one-dimensional evil Germans and equally one-dimensional happenstance poor Jews. {*1} The third and [likely] final reason, is collective guilt instilled by Western education for allowing it to happen, or not doing enough to stop it.

Now, that all said, I wish to re-examine what we know of the Holocaust, and invite you to do it along with me. No, this is not “Holocaust Denial.” The Holocaust was quite real and very tragic. The over-used and slanderous Holocaust Denier label has been carefully crafted, to focus the debate on what happened, and prevent those who are prone to ask questions, from ever finding out who was behind the Holocaust, and their reasons for carrying it out.

“The dust of controversy is merely the falsehood flying off.”

— Thomas Carlyle (1795-1881) British historian and essayist.

This video may be long, and it may make some uncomfortable (it did me the first time I saw this). But, we all need to watch it, and more importantly, ask the questions that need to be asked, starting with “Qui Bono?”

Jim Condit Jr.

Norman Finkelstein, a Jew, and the son of a Holocaust survivor, dared to write an excellent concise book, The Holocaust Industry, which while not going as far as the above video, dared to ask the question, “Who has benefited from all these Holocaust settlements?” He pointed out that his mother, had, to date, received approximately $250, while the super-rich front-men of the extortion operation like Edgar Bronfman [of Seagram & Sons] and Abe Foxman, the current head of the nefarious ADL organization, have made untold millions. Finkelstein’s reward? A smear campaign by the ADL to deny him tenure.

Undoubtedly, some, due to either brainwashing or lacking the ability to think critically, will Pavlovianly label Jim Condit and perhaps myself as antisemites, and then, apply the Woody Allenesque label of “Self-Loathing Jew” to Normal Finkelstein. Those old labels are tired and over-used. Don’t fall into the trap of using them. Stop being a victim of media mind manipulation.

holocause industrydishonest abehitler's jewish soldiers

“Antisemitism” itself is a superfluous phrase. {*2} Racism is racism. Why is there a special label for some particular brand of it. Why is there no such thing as anti-blackism, anti-asianism or anti-arabism? A Semite is basically a person allegedly descended from one of Noah’s sons, Shem. As there is no way to ascertain Shem’s DNA, the label Semite is generally applied to peoples who speak any of the Semitic languages, like Hebrew or Arabic [so, yes the Palestinians are Semites].

The issue has got absolutely nothing to do with Judaism. This is about Zionism. It is not a religion. It is a political movement. Equating Jews with Zionism is akin to equating Christians with Neoconservatism.

“The Zionists brought us to the Holocaust. It is well known that it was possible to redeem Jews from the Nazis with money, and save many … all hundreds of thousands of Jews in Hungary…THE ZIONIST LEADERS WHO NOW SIT IN GOVERNMENT PREVENTED IT!”

— Rabbi Shlomo Zalman Ehrenreich (circa 1954)

The most telling sign that there may be something to Conduit’s intelligent analysis, is one he did not elaborate on. We need to break down the word Holocaust etymologically. It is a Hebrew word. {*3} What does it mean? Ready for this? “Burnt offering.” No, it doesn’t mean tragedy, genocide, or mass-murder. It is a sacrificial burnt offering. The word didn’t even come into mass use until 1968. Who would use a Hebrew word to describe the event that would imply sacrifice to some “gods” somewhere? Use your critical thinking ability. No, not the Germans. The Zionists!

theft of palestine

The Zionists needed European Jewry to move to this plot of land they would call Israel. The Jews of Europe were, as one would expect, not into the idea. And, who could blame them? They had done well for themselves in Europe and had become part of the communities where they lived. So, why on earth would they leave everything they’d built behind and go fight to take over someone else’s land in the middle of the dessert?

Well, logic would dictate they wouldn’t. Unless, of course, someone could engineer an event that would force them to leave. Creating the state, however, was in violation of the teachings of the Torah; that only God could bring about a Jewish homeland. However, those who follow weird occult Talmudic beliefs, might justify a man-made IsRaEl, by offering a great sacrifice [i.e., burnt offering] to appease the vengeful and blood-thirsty Gods of old. {*4}

And note, as the video points out, after that puppet Hitler rose to power and began anti-Jewish measures, the USA was all too willing to bar Jewish immigration.


Another very important piece of supporting evidence to this new paradigm of thinking are the origins of the current ethnic make-up of Israel. Most of the Jews in the world today [roughly 90%] are of Ashkenazi descent. The Ashkenazi Jews are the Khazars, which consisted mainly of ethnic Turks [some argue Huns or Mongols] who adopted Judaism as their religion. Today, in Israel, the most repressed minority is surprisingly, not the Palestinians, nor the Arab Israelis, but the Sephardic Jews.

And finally, for those with more esoteric awareness, there is one more tell-tale sign: Ashkenazi. Just stop and think about it. {*5}

Israel Moment #49 – Ashkenazi “Jews” are Actually Gentiles


ashkenazi ask a nazi

Yes. This is Holocaust Truth. The Holocaust Denial game is a statistics trap used to lure progressive thinkers, and either toss them in jail or otherwise dissuade them from their quest, before they get to the core of the truth. The people presently in charge of Israel are the great betrayers of their own people. Should the Jews of the world ever wake up to this truth, the worst massacres of the Old Testament may look tame compared to what they will do to their Zionist overlords. {*6}

“There is nothing to fear except the persistent refusal to find out the truth, the persistent refusal to analyze the causes of happenings.”

— Dorothy Thompson (1893-1961) American journalist.

This is the truth. The truth can be scary. The truth is not politically correct. The truth does not fit into the black and white world your momma and daddy raised you in. Grow up. Wake up. Face the truth.

Read further The Celtic Rebel

“The dust of controversy is merely the falsehood flying off.”

— Thomas Carlyle (1795-1881) British historian and essayist.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.